Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCall v. State of SC, 97-7593 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7593 Visitors: 41
Filed: Jun. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7593 TOMMY MCCALL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-2127-5-22) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tommy McCall, Appe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7593 TOMMY MCCALL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-2127-5-22) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tommy McCall, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tommy McCall seeks to appeal the district court's order deny- ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and denying in part his motion for reconsid- eration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny McCall's motion for a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McCall v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-2127-5-22 (D.S.C. Sept. 11 & Oct. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer