UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHARON PENDERGRASS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-216, CA-97-1249-21B-4) Submitted: June 16, 1998 Decided: July 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharon Pendergrass, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sharon Pendergrass seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pendergrass, Nos. CR-92-216; CA-97-1249- 21B-4 (D.S.C. Nov. 13, 1997). We also deny Pendergrass’ “Motion Re- questing Additional Grounds to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Set Aside/ Vacate or Correct A Sentence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2