Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cutkelvin v. Corcoran, 97-7766 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7766 Visitors: 49
Filed: Feb. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7766 GLENFORD ANTHONY CUTKELVIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-1394-CCB) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7766 GLENFORD ANTHONY CUTKELVIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-1394-CCB) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenford Anthony Cutkelvin, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARY- LAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cutkelvin v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1394-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer