Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Honeyblue, 97-7802 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7802 Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 04, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7802 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH HONEYBLUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-153-G, CA-97-61-2) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpubl
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7802 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH HONEYBLUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-153-G, CA-97-61-2) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Honeyblue, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinions, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Honeyblue, Nos. CR-91-153-G; CA-97-61-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1997; Nov. 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer