Filed: Sep. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7823 GARY RAMON JOHNSON-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3720-MJG) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7823 GARY RAMON JOHNSON-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3720-MJG) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7823 GARY RAMON JOHNSON-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3720-MJG) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson-Bey v. Sacchet, No. CA-97-3720-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
