Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jihad v. Harvey, 97-7848 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7848 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7848 TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD, a/k/a Vincent Edward Little, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES HARVEY, Regional Administrator; LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden; JOYCE BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-1971-2-22AJ) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER and MURN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7848 TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD, a/k/a Vincent Edward Little, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES HARVEY, Regional Administrator; LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden; JOYCE BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-1971-2-22AJ) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. ยง 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jihad v. Harvey, No. CA-96-1971-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer