Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kent v. American Tenant, 98-1041 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1041 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1041 JEFFREY KENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN TENANT SCREEN, INCORPORATED, t/a ATS; DANIEL STERLING, Representative; TIMOTHY O'SULLIVAN, Representative, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 97-2838-S) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1041 JEFFREY KENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN TENANT SCREEN, INCORPORATED, t/a ATS; DANIEL STERLING, Representative; TIMOTHY O'SULLIVAN, Representative, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 97-2838-S) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Leonard C. Redmond, III, REDMOND, BURGIN & GUTIERREZ, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. ยงยง 1681a-t (1994), and a state law claim of defamation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kent v. American Tenant Screen, Inc., No. CA-97-2838-S (D. Md. Dec. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer