Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Scott v. Barrons Enterprises, 98-1159 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1159 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1159 In Re: JONATHAN H. SCOTT, Debtor. _ JONATHAN H. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERTA L. SCOTT; JAMES P. SCOTT, Parties in Interest, versus BARRONS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-1160 In Re: RIXIE L. SCOTT, Debtor. _ RIXIE L. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERTA L. SCOTT; JAMES P. SCOTT, Parties in Interest, versus BARRONS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-1161 I
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1159 In Re: JONATHAN H. SCOTT, Debtor. _________________________ JONATHAN H. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERTA L. SCOTT; JAMES P. SCOTT, Parties in Interest, versus BARRONS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-1160 In Re: RIXIE L. SCOTT, Debtor. _________________________ RIXIE L. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERTA L. SCOTT; JAMES P. SCOTT, Parties in Interest, versus BARRONS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-1161 In Re: ROBERTA L. SCOTT and DAVID W. SCOTT, Debtors. _________________________ DAVID W. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JAMES P. SCOTT, Party in Interest, versus BARRONS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. 2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3150-AW, CA-97-3151-AW, CA-97-3152-AW, BK-10186-PM, BK-95- 15350-DK, BK-95-17837-PM, AP-96-1099, AP-96-1024, AP-96-1053, AP- 96-1024) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan H. Scott, Rixie L. Scott, David W. Scott, Appellants Pro Se. Alan Lloyd Fishbein, FISHBEIN & FISHBEIN, P.A., Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 3 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order affirming the order of the bankruptcy court denying Appellants' discharges in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Barrons, Nos. CA-97-3150- AW; BK-96-10186-PM; CA-97-3151-AW; BK-95-15350-DK; CA-97-3152-AW; BK-95-17837-PM (D. Md. Jan. 5 & 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 4
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer