Filed: Jun. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1288 STEVEN R. GOINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-12212) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven R. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Loretta C. Argrett, Laurie Allyn Snyder, Gilbert
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1288 STEVEN R. GOINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-12212) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven R. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Loretta C. Argrett, Laurie Allyn Snyder, Gilbert ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1288 STEVEN R. GOINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-12212) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven R. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Loretta C. Argrett, Laurie Allyn Snyder, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the tax court’s order determining a deficiency with respect to his 1989 federal income tax liability. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. According- ly, we grant Appellant’s motion to supplement his informal brief and affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Goins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 95-12212 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 9, 1998). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2