UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1699 HERBERT ARTHUR CONSIDDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDDIE SHEPPARD; TOM AUSTIN; GREG ATLER; HALMODE APPAREL, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Kelwood & Company, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1072-R) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Arthur Considder, Appellant Pro Se. William Fain Ruther- ford, Jr., Kerith Cohen, FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD & JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Herbert A. Considder appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for reconsideration of its order dismissing his claims under the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998), and the Age Dis- crimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Considder v. Sheppard, No. CA-96-1072-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 17, 1998; Apr 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2