Filed: Dec. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2378 GERALD L. WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-97-48-3) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2378 GERALD L. WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-97-48-3) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2378 GERALD L. WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-97-48-3) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald L. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gerald L. Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging wrongful discharge from employ- ment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. See Wilson v. Brown, No. CA-97-48-3 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 5. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
