Filed: Dec. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2468 NORMAN EARL HOLLY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 96-18414) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Earl Holly, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Loretta C. Argrett, Michelle Bachand O’Connor, UNIT
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2468 NORMAN EARL HOLLY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 96-18414) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Earl Holly, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Loretta C. Argrett, Michelle Bachand O’Connor, UNITE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2468
NORMAN EARL HOLLY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 96-18414)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Earl Holly, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen,
Loretta C. Argrett, Michelle Bachand O’Connor, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL
REVENUE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Norman Holly noted this appeal from the tax court’s decision
outside the ninety-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P.
13(a). See also 26 U.S.C. § 7483 (1994). The tax court entered
its final decision on June 23, 1998; Holly filed his notice of
appeal in this court on September 23, 1998, which then forwarded
the notice to the tax court. Holly did not timely move to vacate
or revise the decision in accordance with Tax Ct. R. 162. Holly’s
failure to note a timely appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction
to consider this case. See Spencer Med. Assoc. v. Commissioner,
155 F.3d 268, 269 (4th Cir. 1998). We therefore grant the Commis-
sioner’s motion and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2