Filed: Jul. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6057 LARRY MAURICE WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT CENTER; J. CODY, MRS.; J. T. HALL, Captain; K. L. OSBORNE, Warden, Department of Corrections (C.C.B.), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-732-R) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6057 LARRY MAURICE WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT CENTER; J. CODY, MRS.; J. T. HALL, Captain; K. L. OSBORNE, Warden, Department of Corrections (C.C.B.), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-732-R) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAG..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6057 LARRY MAURICE WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARION CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT CENTER; J. CODY, MRS.; J. T. HALL, Captain; K. L. OSBORNE, Warden, Department of Corrections (C.C.B.), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-732-R) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Maurice Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Marion Corr. Ctr., No. CA-97-732-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
