Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilley v. Barnes, 98-6088 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6088 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6088 RAYMOND FREDERICK GILLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; B. WOODLIFT, Admin- istrator, Prison Health Services; KENNETH WATKINS, Lieutenant; WARRON MCLENDON, Ser- geant; CHARLES SMITH, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-702-2) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Dec
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6088 RAYMOND FREDERICK GILLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; B. WOODLIFT, Admin- istrator, Prison Health Services; KENNETH WATKINS, Lieutenant; WARRON MCLENDON, Ser- geant; CHARLES SMITH, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-702-2) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Frederick Gilley, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Moore Lewis, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Pamela Ann Robertson, ELROD, LAWING & SHARPLESS, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilley v. Barnes, No. CA- 96-702-2 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer