Filed: Jul. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6110 JOHNNY LOUIS WARDLAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENT G. LYNCH, JR., Public Defender; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 4110-MJG) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Sen
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6110 JOHNNY LOUIS WARDLAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENT G. LYNCH, JR., Public Defender; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 4110-MJG) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Seni..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6110 JOHNNY LOUIS WARDLAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENT G. LYNCH, JR., Public Defender; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 4110-MJG) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Louis Wardlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wardlaw v. Lynch, No. CA-97-4110-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
