Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Martin v. State of WV, 98-6492 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6492 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6492 JOHN DINO MARTIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; JOHN DOE, 1-5, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-96-159-5) Submitted: June 18, 1
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6492 JOHN DINO MARTIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; JOHN DOE, 1-5, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-96-159-5) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Dino Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. West Virginia, No. CA- 96-159-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer