Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gant v. Reno, 98-6495 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6495 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 29, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6495 ALLAN L. GANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General; CATHERINE HAWKS, Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons; WILLIAM J. THOMPSON, Warden, Federal Correc- tional Institute-Morgantown; VICTOR SIHA, M.D., Medical Director; BLANCO, Physicians As- sistant; TAYLOR, Physicians Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6495 ALLAN L. GANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General; CATHERINE HAWKS, Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons; WILLIAM J. THOMPSON, Warden, Federal Correc- tional Institute-Morgantown; VICTOR SIHA, M.D., Medical Director; BLANCO, Physicians As- sistant; TAYLOR, Physicians Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-29-1) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. Reno, No. CA-97-29-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer