Filed: Sep. 03, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6570 FREDERICK SHAWNEE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEE JONES, Gauley Bridge City Police Chief; TOWN OF GAULEY BRIDGE, WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees, and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Sheriff; MITCH CANTERBURY, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; JIM SIZEMORE, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; PETE LOPEZ, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; LAWRENCE WASHINGTON, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; EVERETTE STEE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6570 FREDERICK SHAWNEE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEE JONES, Gauley Bridge City Police Chief; TOWN OF GAULEY BRIDGE, WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees, and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Sheriff; MITCH CANTERBURY, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; JIM SIZEMORE, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; PETE LOPEZ, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; LAWRENCE WASHINGTON, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; EVERETTE STEEL..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6570 FREDERICK SHAWNEE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEE JONES, Gauley Bridge City Police Chief; TOWN OF GAULEY BRIDGE, WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees, and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Sheriff; MITCH CANTERBURY, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; JIM SIZEMORE, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; PETE LOPEZ, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; LAWRENCE WASHINGTON, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; EVERETTE STEELE, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy; CHUCK MOSES, Fayette County Sheriff’s Deputy, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-96-436-5) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Shawnee Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Paul McGowan, Jeffrey Kent Phillips, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Vir- ginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Jones, No. CA-96-436-5 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 22, 1997). Furthermore, we deny Appellant’s motions for the production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2