Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Guilfoyle v. Angelone, 98-6608 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6608 Visitors: 65
Filed: Sep. 01, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6608 DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. No. 98-6609 DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6608 DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. No. 98-6609 DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1237-2, CA-96-1238-2) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David J. Guilfoyle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Guilfoyle v. Angelone, Nos. CA-96-1237-2; CA-96-1238-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We grant Guilfoyle’s motion to incorporate his brief filed in No. 98-6609, to No. 98-6608. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer