Filed: Oct. 27, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7072 RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT IRONS, Judge; DEBRA DALTON, Prosecutor of Monroe County; MIKE GRAVELY, Magistrate of Monroe County; MASON ADKINS, Magistrate of Monroe County; KENNEY HEDRICK, West Virginia State Police Union Detachment; MIKE FROBLE; MICKEY SYLVESTER, Conservation Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Vir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7072 RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT IRONS, Judge; DEBRA DALTON, Prosecutor of Monroe County; MIKE GRAVELY, Magistrate of Monroe County; MASON ADKINS, Magistrate of Monroe County; KENNEY HEDRICK, West Virginia State Police Union Detachment; MIKE FROBLE; MICKEY SYLVESTER, Conservation Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virg..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7072 RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT IRONS, Judge; DEBRA DALTON, Prosecutor of Monroe County; MIKE GRAVELY, Magistrate of Monroe County; MASON ADKINS, Magistrate of Monroe County; KENNEY HEDRICK, West Virginia State Police Union Detachment; MIKE FROBLE; MICKEY SYLVESTER, Conservation Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-97-399-1) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: Occtober 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ray Derwood Sizemore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ray Derwood Sizemore appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Sizemore v. Irons, No. CA-97-399-1 (S.D.W. Va. July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2