Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Veras, 98-7230 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7230 Visitors: 40
Filed: Oct. 29, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MIGUEL VERAS; DAVID VERAS, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95- 91-MJG, CA-98-390-MJG, CA-98-391-MJG) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 29, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MIGUEL VERAS; DAVID VERAS, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95- 91-MJG, CA-98-390-MJG, CA-98-391-MJG) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 29, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Miguel Veras, David Veras, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for an extension of time to file their motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and district court’s order denying their § 2255 motion. The district court granted a certif- icate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Veras, Nos. CR-95-91-MJG; CA-98-390-MJG; CA-98-391-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 15, 1997 & July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer