Filed: Dec. 21, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7312 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GARY E. WEST, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-269-A) Submitted: November 24, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7312 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GARY E. WEST, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-269-A) Submitted: November 24, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7312
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GARY E. WEST,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-269-A)
Submitted: November 24, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary E. West, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Christian Pilger, IV,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gary E. West seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his post-conviction motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 and
district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.
West’s notice of appeal was filed outside of the appeal period and
beyond the time in which the district court could have granted him
an extension of time to appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) (providing
ten-day appeal period and thirty-day extension upon showing of
excusable neglect for filing notice of appeal in criminal cases);
see also United States v. Breit,
754 F.2d 526, 528-29 (4th Cir.
1985) (ten-day period applies to Rule 35 motions). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2