Filed: Feb. 10, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1980 In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _ LYNN GOLD, Claimant - Appellant, versus DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Senior District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelly, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85- 1307-R) Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and M
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1980 In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _ LYNN GOLD, Claimant - Appellant, versus DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Senior District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelly, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85- 1307-R) Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MI..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1980 In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _________________________ LYNN GOLD, Claimant - Appellant, versus DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Senior District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelly, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85- 1307-R) Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lynn Gold, Appellant Pro Se. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lynn Gold appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to preserve records and motion for extension of trial start time. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. In Re: A. H. Robins Co. (Gold v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust), No. CA-85-1307-R (E.D. Va. June 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2