Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Burt v. Denton Sheriff, 98-2280 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-2280 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 10, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2280 LISA BURT, c/o Darrell Burns Minor Son, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENTON SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, of Police; PHILLIP BROWN, Sheriff; RONALD DIXON, Actual “Tortfeasor” Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-3416-CCB) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, an
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2280 LISA BURT, c/o Darrell Burns Minor Son, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENTON SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, of Police; PHILLIP BROWN, Sheriff; RONALD DIXON, Actual “Tortfeasor” Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-3416-CCB) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa Burt, Appellant Pro Se. Paul T. Cuzmanes, Samuel Maddox Riley, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lisa Burt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Burt’s motion to expedite, deny Burt’s motion for emergency relief and to supplement the record, and dismiss the appeal. See Burt v. Denton Sheriff, No. CA-97-3416-CCB (D. Md. July 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer