Filed: Aug. 06, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2551 RONALD E. LEKARZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GRIEG HOLDINGS AS; JOACHIM GRIEG & COMPANY AS; GRIEG SHIPPING AS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1287-WMN) Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: August 6, 1999 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpub
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2551 RONALD E. LEKARZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GRIEG HOLDINGS AS; JOACHIM GRIEG & COMPANY AS; GRIEG SHIPPING AS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1287-WMN) Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: August 6, 1999 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpubl..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2551
RONALD E. LEKARZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GRIEG HOLDINGS AS; JOACHIM GRIEG & COMPANY AS;
GRIEG SHIPPING AS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-98-1287-WMN)
Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: August 6, 1999
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William E. Tisano, Ellicot City, Maryland, for Appellant. W.
Cameron Beard, HEALY & BAILLIE, L.L.P., New York, New York; M.
Hamilton Whitman, Jr., Jeffrey A. Regner, OBER, KALER, GRIMES &
SHRIVER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ronald E. LeKarz appeals the district court’s order dismissing
this diversity defamation action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2).
On appeal, LeKarz contends that the district court abused its dis-
cretion in declining to allow LeKarz limited discovery regarding
the jurisdictional issue. See Mylan Lab., Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.,
2
F.3d 56, 64 (4th Cir. 1993). Our review of the record reveals no
abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See LeKarz v. Grieg Holdings AS, No. CA-98-
1287-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2