UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.                                                                       No. 98-4511

CIRO MARQUEZ CHAVEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.
James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-97-265)

Submitted: March 25, 1999

Decided: April 2, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Joaquin Perez, THE CORAL WAY LAW CENTER, INC., Miami,
Florida, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney,
Sandra J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ciro Marquez Chavez pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to dis-
tribute cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and one count of using
or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking
offense, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West Supp. 1998). He was sen-
tenced to a term of 114 months imprisonment for the drug offense
with a consecutive five-year sentence for the firearm offense. Chavez
appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred in consid-
ering drug amounts which were not charged in the indictment. We
affirm.

Chavez was arrested after one of his customers, Greg Holt, became
an informant and brought an undercover officer to Chavez. The offi-
cer bought 266.9 grams of cocaine from Chavez and a codefendant.
Holt subsequently gave a statement describing his purchases of
cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine from Chavez. He also tes-
tified at Chavez' sentencing hearing. Holt testified that he bought the
equivalent, for sentencing purposes, of 1370 kilograms of marijuana
from Chavez.* This amount produced a base offense level of 32. See
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c)(4) (1997) (1000-3000
kilograms of marijuana); USSG § 1B1.3(a)(2) (drug transactions
which are part of the same course of conduct as the offense of convic-
tion are considered in determining the sentence). Chavez admitted
selling Holt amounts totaling 1061 kilograms of marijuana equivalent,
which also produced a base offense level of 32. The district court
determined that Chavez' base offense level was 32.

On appeal, Chavez argues that it is a violation of due process to
_________________________________________________________________
*To determine the sentencing guideline range, different types of drugs
are converted to marijuana equivalents. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
Manual § 2D1.1, comment. (n.10) (1997).

                    2
hold him responsible for conduct which was not charged or proved
and to which he has not pled guilty. The argument is without merit.
Chavez pled guilty to participating in a drug conspiracy and was sen-
tenced for that crime. The type and quantity of drugs is a sentencing
factor which must only be proved by a preponderance of the evidence
to comply with due process requirements. See United States v.
Engleman, 

, 184 (4th Cir. 1990). In any case, Chavez
admitted distributing the amount of drugs for which he was held
responsible.

We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

                    3