Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Robinson, 98-7244 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7244 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 05, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7244 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENYATTA ROBINSON, a/k/a Kavon Henderson, a/k/a Kevin Clark, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-47-2) Submitted: July 27, 1999 Decided: August 5, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7244 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENYATTA ROBINSON, a/k/a Kavon Henderson, a/k/a Kevin Clark, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-47-2) Submitted: July 27, 1999 Decided: August 5, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenyatta Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Robinson, No. CR-94-17; CA-97-47-2 (E.D. Va. July 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer