Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Meadows v. Angelone, 98-7328 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7328 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 17, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7328 RUSSELL DEVON MEADOWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Depart- ment of Corrections; WARDEN SAUNDERS; J.W. MCQUAIG; D. VORGERT; L.R. SPARKS; CHAPLAIN TURNER; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-543-R) Submitted: March 11
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7328 RUSSELL DEVON MEADOWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Depart- ment of Corrections; WARDEN SAUNDERS; J.W. MCQUAIG; D. VORGERT; L.R. SPARKS; CHAPLAIN TURNER; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-543-R) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell Devon Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Meadows v. Angelone, No. CA-97-543-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer