Filed: Feb. 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7423 DAVID M. GARCIA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1374-3-17BC) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7423 DAVID M. GARCIA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1374-3-17BC) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Ju..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7423
DAVID M. GARCIA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, At-
torney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-1374-3-17BC)
Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David M. Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion, accepting the magis-
trate judge’s recommendation, and the order denying reconsideration
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Garcia’s motion
for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Garcia v. South Carolina, No.
CA-97-1374-3-17BC (D.S.C. Aug. 7 & Sept. 8, 1998).* We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), the orders from
which Garcia appeals were entered on the district court’s docket
August 7 and September 8, 1998. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d
1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
2