UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7442 CRECENCIO PEREZ-PEREZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus C. E. FLOYD, Warden; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3742-0-06-BD) Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior District Court. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Crecencio Perez-Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Crecencio Perez-Perez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perez-Perez v. Floyd, No. CA-97-3742-0-06-BD (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2