Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allen v. State of WV, 98-7720 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7720 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 25, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7720 WILLIAM F. ALLEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; KENNETH L. GORBY, Mag- istrate; FRAY QUEEN, JR., Magistrate; JAMES TERRANGO, Magistrate; PERRI JO DECHRISTOPHER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney; JOHN W. HAWKINS, Deputy Sheriff; A. F. MARANO, Deputy Sheriff; SHAWN MORGAN; PAUL FURBEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virgini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7720 WILLIAM F. ALLEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; KENNETH L. GORBY, Mag- istrate; FRAY QUEEN, JR., Magistrate; JAMES TERRANGO, Magistrate; PERRI JO DECHRISTOPHER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney; JOHN W. HAWKINS, Deputy Sheriff; A. F. MARANO, Deputy Sheriff; SHAWN MORGAN; PAUL FURBEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-156) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William F. Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William F. Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. West Virginia, No. CA-98-156 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer