Filed: Mar. 18, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1136 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR., Honorable, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-99-3-5) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before LUTTIG and WIDENER, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1136 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR., Honorable, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-99-3-5) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before LUTTIG and WIDENER, Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1136 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR., Honorable, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-99-3-5) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before LUTTIG and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Basil F. Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. According- ly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Graham v. Stamp, No. CA-99-3-5 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
