Filed: Nov. 09, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1494 JESSE MCKNIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUBY POIREL, Defendant - Appellee, and WALTER ROBINSON, t/a Calvert Realty Company, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-3889-JFM) Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Af
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1494 JESSE MCKNIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUBY POIREL, Defendant - Appellee, and WALTER ROBINSON, t/a Calvert Realty Company, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-3889-JFM) Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Aff..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1494
JESSE MCKNIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUBY POIREL,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WALTER ROBINSON, t/a Calvert Realty Company,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-97-3889-JFM)
Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Saul E. Kerpelman, SAUL E. KERPELMAN & ASSOCIATES, Baltimore, Mary-
land, for Appellant. Thomas K. Lehrich, Sean D. Hummel, Washing-
ton, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jesse McKnight appeals from the district court's June 29,
1998, order rescinding its previous order of April 24, 1998, which
allowed him to amend his complaint to add Walter Robinson t/a
Calvert Realty as a defendant. McKnight argues that the court did
not retain jurisdiction to rescind its order or strike Robinson as
a defendant. Finding no error, we affirm.
We find that the court retained jurisdiction to reconsider,
rescind, or modify its previous non-dispositive order. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 21; Melancon v. Texaco, Inc.,
659 F.2d 551, 553 (5th Cir.
Unit A Oct. 1981). We also find that the court properly balanced
the equitable interests in determining that Robinson should not be
added as a party based upon McKnight's failure to serve Robinson;
the lack of proof that Robinson was presently a non-diverse,
necessary, and indispensable party; and the fact that McKnight may
have sought the joinder to defeat diversity jurisdiction. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 19; Hensgens v. Deere & Co.,
833 F.2d 1179, 1182 (5th
Cir. 1987).
We therefore affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2