Filed: Aug. 10, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1798 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Rev. (American Indian Ministries), Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; AFRO-AMERICAN NEWS, O/B/O NAACP, BLACK PANTHER MOVEMENT; BLACK MUSLIMS; MALCOLM XIST; GOVERNORS OFFICE - ELECTION PROCESS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1421-WMN) Submitted: A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1798 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Rev. (American Indian Ministries), Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; AFRO-AMERICAN NEWS, O/B/O NAACP, BLACK PANTHER MOVEMENT; BLACK MUSLIMS; MALCOLM XIST; GOVERNORS OFFICE - ELECTION PROCESS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1421-WMN) Submitted: Au..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1798 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Rev. (American Indian Ministries), Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; AFRO-AMERICAN NEWS, O/B/O NAACP, BLACK PANTHER MOVEMENT; BLACK MUSLIMS; MALCOLM XIST; GOVERNORS OFFICE - ELECTION PROCESS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1421-WMN) Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 10, 1999 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Ellis Harley Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ellis Harley Barber appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, No. CA-99-1421-WMN (D. Md. May 27, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2