Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Salanik v. Board of Education, 99-1886 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-1886 Visitors: 44
Filed: Oct. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1886 STEPHEN M. SALANIK, a minor; JUNE A. SALANIK, mother, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE ARUN- DEL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-99-1348-S) Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: Oct
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1886 STEPHEN M. SALANIK, a minor; JUNE A. SALANIK, mother, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE ARUN- DEL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-99-1348-S) Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 26, 1999 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June A. Salanik, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Stephen and June Salanik appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint against Defendants for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Salanik v. Board of Education, No. CA-99-1348-S (D. Md. May 24 & June 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer