Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Turner v. Fisher, 99-1961 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-1961 Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1961 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDY FISHER, Sheriff of Augusta County, Vir- ginia; BERNARD MURPHY, City Manager, Staunton, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. No. 99-1964 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 99-1965 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIR- GINIA; COUNTY OF AUGUSTA;
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1961 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDY FISHER, Sheriff of Augusta County, Vir- ginia; BERNARD MURPHY, City Manager, Staunton, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. No. 99-1964 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 99-1965 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIR- GINIA; COUNTY OF AUGUSTA; AUGUSTA COUNTY GOV- ERNMENT CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-98-50-R, MISC-99-4, MISC-99-50-7) Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 29, 1999 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Fisher, No. MISC-98-50-R (W.D. Va. June 10, 1999); Turner v. DEA, No. MISC-99-4 (W.D. Va. June 10, 1999); Turner v. United States, No. MISC-99-50-7 (W.D. Va. June 21, 1999). We deny the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appoint- ment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer