Filed: Dec. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2438 SARAH RAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREENVILLE COUNTY, School District; BRENDA TURNER; SUSAN B. HILL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-2282-6-20AK) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cui
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2438 SARAH RAY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREENVILLE COUNTY, School District; BRENDA TURNER; SUSAN B. HILL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-2282-6-20AK) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2438
SARAH RAY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENVILLE COUNTY, School District; BRENDA
TURNER; SUSAN B. HILL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-2282-6-20AK)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sarah Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sarah Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order adopting
a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to dismiss her em-
ployment action. Because Williams did not file specific objections
to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district
court did not err in adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation
to dismiss her claim as barred by res judicata. See Wells v.
Shriners Hosp.,
109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v.
Schronce,
727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment of the district court. See Williams v. Greenville
Co., No. CA-99-2282-6-20AK (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2