Filed: Jun. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6203 TROY L. RICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; AT- TORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1953-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Ju
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6203 TROY L. RICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; AT- TORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1953-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Jud..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6203 TROY L. RICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; AT- TORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1953-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy L. Rice, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARY- LAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rice v. Warden, No. CA-98-1953-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2