UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6215 ANTHONY ALEXANDER PITTMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PORTSMOUTH CITY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; THE JOHNS/JANE DOES, in Classification; MAJOR BULLOCK; DEPUTY JONES; LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE; THE JOHNS/JANE DOES that were involved rightly in securing the incident; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-199) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Alexander Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony Alexander Pittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint for failure to establish administrative exhaustion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pittman v. Portsmouth City Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-98- 199 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1999). We note that the district court dis- missed the action without prejudice; Pittman will still be subject to the administrative exhaustion requirement if he chooses to re- file. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2