Filed: Jul. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6495 JAMES H. FITZGERALD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. FRYE, Chief Physician of the Chesterfield County Jail; MEDICAL STAFF, “Unknown Nurses” of the Chesterfield County Jail; NATIVIDAD STOVER, M.D.; MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, “John Doe, Unknown Medical Intern,” Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6495 JAMES H. FITZGERALD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. FRYE, Chief Physician of the Chesterfield County Jail; MEDICAL STAFF, “Unknown Nurses” of the Chesterfield County Jail; NATIVIDAD STOVER, M.D.; MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, “John Doe, Unknown Medical Intern,” Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior D..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6495
JAMES H. FITZGERALD, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. FRYE, Chief Physician of the Chesterfield
County Jail; MEDICAL STAFF, “Unknown Nurses”
of the Chesterfield County Jail; NATIVIDAD
STOVER, M.D.; MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA,
“John Doe, Unknown Medical Intern,”
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-598-AM)
Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James H. Fitzgerald, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Lynne J. Fiscella, LAW
OFFICE OF COTTER, FISCELLA & MCCONNELL, Fairfax, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James H. Fitzgerald, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the dis-
trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fitzgerald v.
Frye, No. CA-98-598-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2