Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jones v. Cheeks, 99-6607 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-6607 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6607 NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. CHEEKS, Officer, C.O. II; ROY JONES, Lieutenant, C.O. IV; FREDDIE CHARLES, Deputy Sheriff; MR. OR MCCREARY, DEPUTY SHERIFF; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees, and THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Unit Supervisor; LINWOOD PERKINS, Captain; DENNIS BROWN, Offi- cer, C.O. II; GLENDURA HOLLAND, Sergeant, C.O. II; RICHARD
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6607 NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. CHEEKS, Officer, C.O. II; ROY JONES, Lieutenant, C.O. IV; FREDDIE CHARLES, Deputy Sheriff; MR. OR MCCREARY, DEPUTY SHERIFF; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees, and THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Unit Supervisor; LINWOOD PERKINS, Captain; DENNIS BROWN, Offi- cer, C.O. II; GLENDURA HOLLAND, Sergeant, C.O. II; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner of Corrections; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Agency/Subagency; EILEEN A. REILLY, Assistant A.A. County State’s Attorney; FRANK R. WEATHERSBEE, State Attorney for Anne Arundel, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 2437-L) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Angela Michelle Eaves, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Allan Fry, Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland; John Francis Breads, Jr., Phillip F. Scheibe, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Nicholas Warner Jones appeals two district court orders grant- ing summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Cheeks, No. CA-97-2437-L (D. Md. Jan. 29 & Apr. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer