Filed: Jul. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6686 GLENN R. GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRAGGY MEDICAL STAFF, at Craggy Correctional Center; MARION MEDICAL STAFF, at Marion Cor- rectional Institution; LEWIS DAVIS, Lieutenant at Craggy Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-41-1-3-MU) Submitted: July 8, 19
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6686 GLENN R. GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRAGGY MEDICAL STAFF, at Craggy Correctional Center; MARION MEDICAL STAFF, at Marion Cor- rectional Institution; LEWIS DAVIS, Lieutenant at Craggy Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-41-1-3-MU) Submitted: July 8, 199..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6686 GLENN R. GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRAGGY MEDICAL STAFF, at Craggy Correctional Center; MARION MEDICAL STAFF, at Marion Cor- rectional Institution; LEWIS DAVIS, Lieutenant at Craggy Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-41-1-3-MU) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenn R. Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Glenn Ralph Goode appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goode v. Craggy Medical Staff, No. CA-98-41-1- 3-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
