Filed: Oct. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6996 JAMI A. KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANNY BLACKWELL, Doctor; JOYCE LLOYD, Nurse; R. BROWN, Sergeant; R. BOWERS, Lieutenant; D. WALTZ, Lieutenant; R. CHAVIS, Associate Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3129-2-17AJ) Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999 Bef
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6996 JAMI A. KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANNY BLACKWELL, Doctor; JOYCE LLOYD, Nurse; R. BROWN, Sergeant; R. BOWERS, Lieutenant; D. WALTZ, Lieutenant; R. CHAVIS, Associate Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3129-2-17AJ) Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999 Befo..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6996 JAMI A. KHALIQ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANNY BLACKWELL, Doctor; JOYCE LLOYD, Nurse; R. BROWN, Sergeant; R. BOWERS, Lieutenant; D. WALTZ, Lieutenant; R. CHAVIS, Associate Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3129-2-17AJ) Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jami A. Khaliq, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John Richard Delmore, MCKAY, MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jami A. Khaliq, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find that this ap- peal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Khaliq v. Blackwell, No. CA-98- 3129-2-17AJ (D.S.C. July 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2