Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burns v. Underwood, 99-7080 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7080 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7080 FREDERICK BURNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CECIL UNDERWOOD, Governor; SANDRA MCCORMICK ILDERTON, Chairperson, West Virginia Parole Board, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-99-345-5) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7080 FREDERICK BURNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CECIL UNDERWOOD, Governor; SANDRA MCCORMICK ILDERTON, Chairperson, West Virginia Parole Board, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-99-345-5) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Burns, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Frederick Burns, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burns v. Underwood, No. CA-99-345-5 (S.D.W. Va. July 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer