Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cason v. Pyatt, 99-7122 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7122 Visitors: 46
Filed: Nov. 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7122 LEROY ROMAN CASON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ADALINE PYATT; RALPH HUNTER, in their indi- vidual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-2396-3-13BC) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed b
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7122 LEROY ROMAN CASON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ADALINE PYATT; RALPH HUNTER, in their indi- vidual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-2396-3-13BC) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Roman Cason, Appellant Pro Se. John K. Blincow, Jr., William Mullins McLeod, Jr., HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Robert Bratton Varnado, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, P.L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leroy Roman Cason appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cason v. Pyatt, No. CA-98-2396-3-13BC (D.S.C. June 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer