Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sydnor v. Lachance, 00-1035 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1035 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 30, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1035 REGINALD L. SYDNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANICE LACHANCE, Head of the Office of Per- sonnel Management; KENNETH S. APFEL, Secre- tary, Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-228-JFM) Submitted: March 23,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1035 REGINALD L. SYDNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANICE LACHANCE, Head of the Office of Per- sonnel Management; KENNETH S. APFEL, Secre- tary, Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-228-JFM) Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Sydnor, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Reginald L. Sydnor appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sydnor v. LaChance, No. CA-99-228-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 27, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer