Filed: Mar. 16, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1061 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEMUEL F. SWINDELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-99-257-1) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lemuel F. Swindell, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1061 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEMUEL F. SWINDELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-99-257-1) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lemuel F. Swindell, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1061 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEMUEL F. SWINDELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-99-257-1) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lemuel F. Swindell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lemuel F. Swindell appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing Swindell’s motion to remove his state court traffic matter to federal court for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See North Carolina v. Swindell, No. CA-99-257-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 1999). We deny Swindell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
