Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp, 00-1182 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1182 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 20, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1182 DIMITRA TANGIRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4181-H) Submitted: July 31, 2000 Decided: September 20, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN* and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1182 DIMITRA TANGIRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4181-H) Submitted: July 31, 2000 Decided: September 20, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN* and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dimitra Tangires, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Serotte, Elizabeth Gross Jacobs, SEROTTE, ROCKMAN & WESCOTT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. * Judge Murnaghan was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dimitra Tangires appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Johns Hopkins Hospital on her complaint filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 2000) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., No. CA-98-4181-H (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2000). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer