Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bush v. Gildenhorn, 00-1248 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1248 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1248 BARBARA M. BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STANTON J. GILDENHORN; MICHAEL L. SUBIN; DOUG- LAS M. TOPOLSKI; ELENA D. MARCUSS; MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE; ALFRED F. BELCUORE; MONTEDONICO, HAMILTON & ALTMAN, P.C., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 99-3710-CCB) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1248 BARBARA M. BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STANTON J. GILDENHORN; MICHAEL L. SUBIN; DOUG- LAS M. TOPOLSKI; ELENA D. MARCUSS; MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE; ALFRED F. BELCUORE; MONTEDONICO, HAMILTON & ALTMAN, P.C., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 99-3710-CCB) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara M. Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Barbara M. Bush appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint seeking “Constitutional and Federal Protection” from the Defendants and alleging that the Defendants conspired to “aggrieve” her because of her race, economic status, employment status, and disabilities. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bush v. Gildenhorn, No. CA-99-3710-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer