UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1343 JONATHAN COBB; DARRYL COBB; ANNETTE COBB, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA; BOARD OF VISITORS; HOVEY S. DABNEY; CHARLES CARAVATI; JOHN ACKERLY, III; CHAMP CLARK; FRANKLIN BIRCKHEAD; WILLIAM CRUTCHFIELD; WILLIAM GOODWIN; T. KEISTER GREER; ELSIE GOODWYN HOLLAND; C. WILSON MCNEELY, III; TERENCE ROSS; ALBERT SMALL; ELIZABETH TWOHY; HENRY VALENTINE, III; WALTER WALKER; JAMES WHEAT, III; KRISTINE LALONDE; ALEXANDER GILLIAM, JR.; WILLIAM HAR- MON; HONOR COMMITTEE; NICOLE ERAMO; JENNIFER ERICKSON; APRIL FEARNLEY; D. CABELL VEST; CLAIR PARRISH; ERIKA WERNER; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF INVESTIGATION PANEL I; JENNIFER JONES; JUSTIN KNEBEL; SCOTT WALKER; KELLY MANN; ELIZABETH BIBB; DEBEER, First Name Unknown; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF INVESTIGATION PANEL II; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF REVIEW PANEL; EDMOND COX; JEFFREY LUDDEN; TIFFANY PANKOW; STEWART MCCUTCHEN; AARON BOOTH; SCOTT WALKER; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD; TIMOTHY ROBERTSON; BENJAMIN WARTHEN; STEWART MCCUTCHEN; AARON BOOTH; SCOTT WALKER; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD; TIMOTHY ROBERTSON; BENJAMIN WARTHEN; JOSEPH WOLFE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-99-7-3) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Cobb, Darryl Cobb, Annette Cobb, Appellants Pro Se. Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Ronald Curtis Forehand, Senior As- sistant Attorney General, Ashley Lionel Taylor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Patrick B. Kelly, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants Jonathan Cobb, Darryl Cobb, and Annette Cobb appeal the district court’s order dismissing Darryl and Annette as plaintiffs for lack of standing, and Jonathan Cobb appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on his civil action alleging violation of his con- stitutional and state law rights. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cobb v. University of Va., No. CA-99-7-3 (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3